자작 빈칸 영어 문제

  Human rights have persistently been heightened by those who address dignity issues with which man is born. On the other hand, some philosophers criticize the partial consideration of dignity,which stands aloof from other species living along with our race. Kant, the German philosopher, views species with no rational mind are not considerable matters when talking about the dignity issues. No matter how great man's rights are treated,there is no need for comparison between the rationals' and the irrationals' who also divide the bad and the good, for one side lacks the ability to get access to the logic. However, it is argued by some other experts that kind of idea comes from the wrong presumption  that  (                          ) . When both kinds have same ability to feel pain and serve their innate voice that is to seek for happiness, it is not rational to eliminate one side, when deciding about rights that we both deserve. Animals from fish to monkey have their own way of giving love to their offspring, and socialize with others. As the word shows, animals can also, to a certain degree, make conducts that are nearly human. This is why the experts asserts that animals have rights despite of the absence of apparent claiming for those rights, unlike humans.

1. arguing is the sole way of qualifying one's rights

2. animals do not have interests in dignity issues

3. animals are born with strong strive for survival 

4. it is the human-like actions that qualifies one's dignity

5. animals are not capable of getting access to the logic